Publications

All articles are the sole copyright of the respective publishers. Materials are provided for educational purposes.
​Downloading of materials constitutes an agreement that the materials are for personal use only
.

(also see Google Scholar)

PEER-REVIEWED JOURNAL ARTICLES

22. Atkinson, C., Buie, H., Sandstrom, G., Aknin, L., & Croft, A. (in press). Testing the GRIP: An Empirical Examination of the Gender Roles Inhibiting Prosociality Model. Sex Roles.

21. Carroll, E., Walker, T., & Croft., A. (in press). Diversifying the bench: Applying social cognitive theories to increase judicial diversity. Social and Personality Psychology Compassdoi: 10.1111/spc3.12580

20. Alexopolous et al. (in press). Settling down without settling: Perceived changes in partner preferences in response to COVID-19 concern. Journal of Social and Personal Relationshipsdoi: 10.1177/02654075211011527

19. Simpson, R. & Croft, A. (in press). Seeing gender in policing: Uniforms and perceived aggression. Women and Criminal Justice. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/08974454.2020.1842290

18. Croft, A., Atkinson, C., Sandstrom, G. M., Orbell, S., & Aknin, L. (2021). Loosening the GRIP (Gender Roles Inhibiting Prosociality) to Promote Gender Equality. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 25, 66-92. doi:10.1177/1088868320964615

17. Lamarche, V., Atkinson, C., & Croft, A. (in press). A cognitive uncoupling: Masculinity threats and the rejection of relationship interdependenceSocial Psychological and Personality Sciencedoi:10.1177/1948550620961263

16. Croft, A., Schmader, T., Beall, A., & Schaller, M. (2020). Breadwinner seeks bottle warmer: How heterosexual women's future aspirations and expectations predict their current mate preferences. Sex Roles, 82, 633-643. doi: 10.1007/s11199-019-01080-6

15. Steltzer, E. M., Atkinson, C., O'Connor, M. F., & Croft, A. (2019). Gender differences in grief narrative construction: Myth or reality? European Journal of Psychotraumatology. 10:1. doi: 10.1080/20008198.2019.1688130 

14. Block, K., Croft, A., De Souza, L., Schmader, T. (2019). Do people care if men don't care about caring? The asymmetry in support for changing gender roles. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 83, 112-131.

**The first two authors contributed equally to the preparation of this manuscript; author order was determined alphabetically. 

13. Sandstrom, G., Schmader, T., Croft, A., and Kwok, N. (2019). A social identity threat perspective on being the target of generosity from a higher status other. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 82, 98-114. doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2018.12.004

**The first two authors contributed equally to the preparation of this manuscript; author order was determined alphabetically. 

12. Croft, A., Schmader, T. & Block, K. (2019). Life in the balance: Are women's possible selves constrained by men's domestic involvement? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 45, 808-823. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167218797294 

11. Carter, A. J., Croft, A., Lukas, D., & Sandstrom, G. M. (2018). Women's visibility in academic seminars: Women ask fewer questions than men. PLoS ONE, 13(9), e0202743.

**More info/resources on Diversity in Academia, please see: http://diversityinacademia.strikingly.com

10. Block, K., Croft, A., & Schmader, T. (2018). Worth less? Why men (and women) devalue care-oriented careers. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 1353. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01353

9. Helm, P. J., Rothschild, L. G., Greenberg, J., & Croft, A. (2018). Explaining sex differences in existential isolation research. Personality and Individual Differences, 134, 283-288. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2018.06.032

8. Croft, A., Schmader, T., & Block, K. (2015). An under-examined inequality: Cultural and psychological barriers to men's engagement with communal roles. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 19, 343-370. doi: 10.1177/1088868314564789

7. Croft, A., Schmader, T., Block, K., & Baron, A.S. (2014). The second shift reflected in the second generation: Do parents’ gender roles at home predict children’s aspirations? Psychological Science, 25, 1418-1428. doi: 10.1177/0956797614533968

6. Croft, A., Dunn, E. W., & Quoidbach, J. (2014). From tribulations to appreciation: Experiencing adversity in the past predicts greater savoring in the present. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 5, 511-516. doi: 10.1177/1948550613512510

5. Schmader, T. Croft, A., & Whitehead, J. (2014). Why can’t I just be myself?: A social cognitive analysis of the working self-concept under stereotype threat. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 5, 4-11. doi: 10.1177/1948550613482988

4. Schmader, T., Croft, A., Whitehead, J., & Stone, J. (2013). A peek inside the target’s toolbox: How stigmatized targets deflect prejudice by invoking a common identity. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 35, 141-149. doi: 10.1080/01973533.2012.746615

3. Croft, A. & Schmader, T. (2012). The feedback withholding bias: Minority students do not receive critical feedback from evaluators concerned about appearing racist. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48, 1139-1144. doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2012.04.010

2. Schmader, T., Croft, A., Scarnier, M., Lickel, B., & Mendes, W. B. (2012). Implicit and explicit emotional reactions to witnessing prejudice. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 15, 379-392. doi: 10.1177/1368430211426163

1. Schmader, T. & Croft, A. (2011). How stereotypes stifle performance potential. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 5, 792-806. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-9004.2011.00390.x

 

 

INVITED ARTICLES AND BOOK CHAPTERS

3. Croft, A., Atkinson, C., & May, Alexis, M. (2021). Promoting gender equality by supporting men's emotional flexibility. Policy Insights from the Behavior and Brain Sciences

2. Croft, A. (2014). Tipping the scale: Strategies for research productivity in grad school. The APS Observer Student Notebook, 27(2), 36-37.

1. Schmader, T., Hall, W., & Croft, A. (2014). Stereotype threat in intergroup relations. In M. Mikulincer and P.R. Shaver (Eds.) APA Handbook of Personality and Social Psychology: Vol. 2. (pp. 447-471). Washington, D.C., American Psychological Association.